- a state in which two things are able to exist or occur together without problem or conflict.
- a feeling of sympathy and friendship; like-mindedness.
We must start with an important truth—there are two kinds of compatibility.
And I might be being a presumptuous D-hole, but I’m under the impression that when the average person speaks about romantic “compatibility,” they’re focusing on the #2 definition. Friendship. Like-mindedness. Similar personalities, interests, wants, life goals, etc.
The focus, to a certain extent, is on ALIKENESS or SAMENESS.
Which isn’t without merit, and helps make a compelling argument for using romantic compatibility charts (like you might find in astrology) and matchmaking tests.
As a general rule, I think it’s fair to feel as if a brothel-owning cocaine enthusiast and an Evangelical Christian aren’t a good match for long-term dating and marriage.
I think it’s fair to feel as if a 24-year-old hip-hop DJ in Brooklyn might not be a great romantic fit with a 41-year-old botany professor in rural Oklahoma.
And before we get into the #1 definition for compatibility, I want to talk about this part a little bit.
Why I Support Radical Discrimination and Profiling in Dating
“What kind of dog should I get?” I typed into Google.
Several sites popped up with dog breed selector tools and quizzes designed to help people find dogs best-suited for particular preferences, lifestyles and living environments.
The American Kennel Club makes its recommendations based on the following categories:
- Living Environment (House or apartment)
- Number of Children
- Number of Other Dogs
- Typical Activity (At home, Walking in neighborhood, Going on adventure)
- Noise Tolerance
- Cleanliness Preferences
Depending on your answers, the AKC returns a short list of recommended matches, almost like an eHarmony for those interested in pet ownership.
Why? How? Are the people at the American Kennel Club dog psychics?
They simply have decades, perhaps more than a century, of historical data which tells us that a Puggle, an Old English Sheepdog, and a Yorkshire Terrier all will exhibit certain characteristics common to those particular breeds, just as a Siberian Husky, French Bulldog and Cocker Spaniel will typically exhibit a different set of characteristics.
I believe this is a positive, useful, helpful practice.
The results of successfully matching certain dog breeds with certain owner preferences are happy dogs delighting happy pet owners who generally aren’t surprised by totally unexpected and negative behavior from their pets.
Successfully matching certain dog breeds with owner preferences significantly reduces the amount of dogs being abandoned at shelters or by the side of the road, reducing demands on animal shelters, and minimizing instances of euthanizing abandoned or stray pets in overpopulated shelters.
“Hey, Matt! Why are you writing about dogs?! Are you an animal blogger now? Is that what this is? Have you been watching ‘Space Buddies’? What’s your favorite dog breed? Pugs? Mastiffs? Are you super-into Yorkies?”
No. I’m not super-into Yorkies.
I’m super-into the idea of using profiling and discrimination in our dating lives and partner selection processes to eliminate potential partners who are metaphorically liable to shit on your floors and destroy your shoes all the time.
The experiences aren’t particularly fun or functional, and the stories tend to have sad—sometimes tragic—endings.
Profiling Isn’t Always Bad
“OMG, Matt! Are you going to say something racist, sexist or bigoted right now?!?!”
No. Settle the fuck down.
Is it okay for police officers to pull someone over because of his or her skin color alone? Never.
But is it okay for banks to lend different amounts of money to borrowers under different conditions based on the individual borrowers’ credit history? I think so.
Is it okay for government-led armies to round up citizens and then imprison and execute them for no other reason than their ethnicity, religious beliefs or country of origin? Right.
But is it okay for college and professional sports teams to choose very large, very fast, very athletic people to be part of their teams as opposed to recruiting a bunch of short, slow and out-of-shape people?
“But coach! How do you know I’m not going to be the best middle linebacker in the history of this football team?! Don’t judge me and tell me what I can’t do!”
Let’s try to avoid running this idea through our political or social justice filters.
SOMETIMES, discrimination and profiling is USEFUL.
It just is. And we need to collectively demonstrate the intelligence and wisdom necessary to know the difference between when it’s okay and not okay.
Our actions and choices in any given moment amount to a calculated gamble.
When we reach out to flip a light switch, we’re estimating how far we need to extend our arms and move our hands and fingers in a way that will flip the switch successfully. I achieve my goal of flipping a light switch on or off almost every time I try. Probably 98 percent. Maybe 99 percent.
Of course, nothing is absolute. Once in a great while, I’ll miss the swipe and have to quickly do it again to turn a light on or off.
We’re guessing when we turn steering wheels, when we eat food, when we jump into water, and when we speak to people.
We have a lot of experience doing these things, and over time, we can predict with near certainty what’s likely to happen when we move around and do routine life things. And we’re right most of the time, which is why you and I are still breathing.
We’re a lot better at these mostly automatic physical movements and routine choices than we are choosing partners with whom we demonstrate the kind of compatibility and relationship skills necessary to not end up sad, divorced and sharing our kids (or Yorkies) on the holidays.
What If We Create Compatibility?
- a state in which two things are able to exist or occur together without problem or conflict.
It’s natural to want to be with people who share our interests and values. And it’s logical (although people somehow screw this up) to seek out a partner who has the same plans for having children and long-term family life.
But—and this is likely observably true in your own life—the interests and quirks and things people find attractive don’t remain static. They change and evolve as we age and experience new things and new people.
According to the Gottman Relationship Blog, Dr. Ted Hudson, a researcher at the University of Texas, conducted a longitudinal study on romantic compatibility in couples who had been married for several years.
“My research shows that there is no difference in the objective compatibility between those couples who are unhappy and those who are happy,” Hudson wrote.
Couples that feel content and positivity within their relationships said that compatibility wasn’t an issue for them. The happy couples in Hudson’s study said it was their own willful behavior that made the relationship successful—not personality compatibility.
When the unhappy couples in the study were asked about compatibility, they all said that compatibility was extremely important to having a successful marriage. And in the midst of their failing marriages, they didn’t believe they were compatible with their partners.
When the unhappy couples said, “We’re incompatible,” what they actually meant was, “We don’t get along very well,” Hudson wrote.
That’s the problem with the word “compatibility.”
Partners unhappy in their relationships often resort to blaming a lack of compatibility for their dysfunctional relationship, the Gottman Institute blog article said.
“They fail to realize and comprehend that a successful relationship does not hinge its posterity on how alike you are, instead it hangs on by the sheer willpower and want to stay in a relationship,” the article said.
Maybe We Can Do Better at Identifying What Really Matters
Natural human chemistry brings people together romantically and sexually. We’ve been making babies and populating the planet using this method for longer than we’ve been recording history.
So this will keep happening.
Just maybe someone who likes to go square dancing on the weekends can have an amazing relationship with a competitive miniature golfer. Just maybe some competitive pit master barbecue guy can have a beautiful family with a vegetarian. After all, two people from the same town, who go to the same church, and know all the same people, and vote the same way, and believe all the same things can have a colossally shitty marriage.
So maybe what we really need to be “compatible” with our partners on aren’t just our stated values, but what we can actually demonstrate that we know and understand.
She wants to talk about it. It makes her feel better.
He doesn’t want to talk about it. It makes him feel worse.
Are they incompatible?
Does being compatible really mean that she fundamentally understands how stressful and difficult conversations that feel cathartic for her, are difficult and damaging for him, and approaches a request for communication accordingly?
And does being compatible really mean that he fundamentally understands that listening to what she has to say, even if it’s inconvenient or a little bit frustrating for him, will strengthen the intimate bond between them, so he’s going to make whatever concessions are necessary to achieve that?
Does being compatible mean that two people are AWAKE to the needs and wants of one another, and that simple demonstrations of respecting and honoring those needs and wants—these little things many people never think about—create as a byproduct all the feel-goodness that makes a person feel connected and compatible.
Love is a choice. Sure, it’s really damn hard after several years inside a shitty marriage, but it doesn’t make it less true.
And I know that’s not helpful to a hurting heart. And I know that’s not going to save a severely damaged relationship.
HOWEVER, when two people mindfully choose to love one another each day—to demonstrate that choice in word and action—all the brokenness and resentment and mistrust? These things that destroy relationships never manifest at all.
It’s easy to chalk it up to incompatibility.
It’s hard to be an adult who gives more to his or her partner than they take for themselves.
But it’s also hard to divorce. It’s hard to say goodbye to your children all the time.
And it’s easy to live in a home where everyone is secure in the love that’s present there. It’s easy to walk into a peaceful space where your heart rate and stress levels don’t increase because another brutal fight could start any minute.
It feels hard to be an adult sometimes.
I think it’s beautiful how hard we try, even when we fail to achieve what we want.
Even when we got what we hoped for and we’re left feeling disappointed.
Even when things we hope for feel beyond reach.
Because I don’t know what’s going to happen tomorrow, but it might turn out to be one of the best days of my life.
I don’t know much, but I’m pretty sure the same is true for you.
Take This Gottman Institute Quiz to Discover How Well You Know Your Partner
Because it seems like a worthwhile thing to know.